Page 1 of 1

A complex question

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:15 pm
by Huny
I am stumped at how to use the word "complexion" when describing a persons complexion. I always hear people use " She is a fair complected woman" but was told the proper way was "She is a fair complexioned woman" When researching the words, it appears as if no one else knows how it should be used in today's grammar.

Usage Note: Complected has a long history in American folk speech, showing up, for example, in 1806 in the journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition: “[The Indians] are... rather lighter complected... than the Indians of the Missouri” (Meriwether Lewis). Complected has long been treated as a dialectal term in dictionaries, but it actually should be regarded as informal Standard English, since its nationwide distribution disqualifies it as a regionalism. In 1915 its reported use in west Texas extended its semantic domain beyond skin color to general appearance: “a fat-complected man.”


It appears a toss-up in my opinion. What do you all think? And would/should the written form differ from the spoken?

Huny - looking for a fair answer...

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:19 pm
by Perry
I have always used the noun. E.g. she had an olive complexion.

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:58 am
by bnjtokyo
As described in your post, "complected" seems to be an Americanism. Google shows "complexioned" is used almost 40% more frequently than "complected," so I would guess the speakers of other dialects of English do not use it as much.

The American Heritage Dictionary says "complected" is used only in combination with an adjective such as "light-complected" or "dark-complected." But trolling across the internet shows the "complexioned" is also almost always used with an adjective like "ruddy," "fair," "pale" etc. that reflect color or tone.

I found only two exceptions: "well complexioned" and "good complexioned."

The following noun phrase universally refers to a human being.

In contrast, "complexion" can be used in more contexts. For example, "The whole religious complexion of the modern world is due to the absence from Jerusalem of a lunatic asylum." -- Thomas Paine

Cheers,

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:19 am
by Perry
The loony bin (or psychiatric hospital, if you prefer) is located just a few minutes SW of Jerusalem, in a wooded mountain location.

In fairness to Mr. Paine, it doubtless was not built in his time.

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:08 pm
by sluggo
The loony bin (or psychiatric hospital, if you prefer) is located just a few minutes SW of Jerusalem, in a wooded mountain location.

In fairness to Mr. Paine, it doubtless was not built in his time.
No doubt. In fact 'tis from the 13th century.

I've always wondered why we say doubtless rather than doubtlessly..?

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:59 am
by Perry
Nice link, but pretty far from Jerusalem, even as the crow flies.

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:19 pm
by sluggo
Nice link, but pretty far from Jerusalem, even as the crow flies.
Aye, I Just pounced on the relationship betwixt Jerusalem and the name of Tom Paine's home-field loonybin.

Oh sorry Huny, we're way off- I always learned that "complected" was an extension that was 'incorrect'. Take the easy way out and say "her complexion was..."

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:33 pm
by Huny
Thank you, everyone, for your input. This has been a word that I have wondered about for some time. I wonder why we even bother having "proper" grammar any more (not like mine is proper to begin with :oops: ). It seems that most dictionaries have an evolved form of some original words and basically say it's OK to use either word. I guess English is truly evolving into a slang language and taking on a life of it's own.

I think I will take sluggo's advice and take the easy way out when use of the word pertaining to someones complexion comes my way. I just seem to cringe when I hear the word complected used by others. It just sounds wrong to my ears. :shock:

Huny

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:44 am
by Perry
Hey, I said it first.

Perry not-that-I-am-keeping-score-or-anything Dror

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:02 pm
by Bailey
Hey, I said it first.

Perry not-that-I-am-keeping-score-or-anything Dror
Perry this happens all the time and the original never gets credit, but then who cares, right?

mark gets-no-credits Bailey

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:21 pm
by Huny
Hey, I said it first.

Perry not-that-I-am-keeping-score-or-anything Dror
Whoopsie!!! Your right, Perry :oops: . I must have been having a brain blip. Please accept my apologies.

Friends???

Hunny --ashamed of my self and wondering where my manners are...

p.s. Bailey, I give you credit for your being such an inspiration to me and many others in this forum :D .

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:01 pm
by Perry
Actually Bailey, you get credit in my book for inventing the throwaway line as a middle name convention. Many of us copy it shamelessly (as I did to reassure that I wasn't really keeping score).

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:14 pm
by Bailey
:oops: I copied it from the snopes person, the one who writes the copy: Barbara the-real-deal Mikkleson

mark the-fake Bailey
but I can accept that I'm good at finding fun trends and capitalizing on them.

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:56 pm
by Huny
Actually Bailey, you get credit in my book for inventing the throwaway line as a middle name convention. Many of us copy it shamelessly (as I did to reassure that I wasn't really keeping score).

That's exactly what I'm referring to! Bailey is real good at being quick on his feet. My mind could never keep up!!

Huny - whose mind strolls along at a leisurely pace.

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:23 pm
by Bailey
Ah heck Huny, my mind goes on impromtu vacations of unknown length at odd times. Strolling is good; like the tortoise and the hare.

mark hare-ing-off-on-tangents Bailey
It always seems like it's someone else's world and we're just living in it.
that's because it is someone else's world, we don't even get to be the masters of our own fate. I'm the sidekick to the cosmos!