Page 1 of 3
“and/or” there has got to be a better way?
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:37 am
by eberntson
I was wondering about conjunctions the other day; then I thought about the fact that there seems to be a word for everything in English, so I came up with this question.
If there is a word for everything in English, why is there no conjunction that is the equivalent of “and/or?” If there is such a word why is not in common use? Are there words in French, German, Russian, Spanish, Latin, Greek, and/or other languages that have a word that means the same thing?
I have always been impressed with the French and their ability to work in the Cartesian frame (++, --, +-, -+) of thought, they must have a way of expressing the "and/or" point of view.
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:35 pm
by Garzo
OK
Deirdre decided to have chips with vinegar and/or mayonaise.
Deidre decided to have chips with either vinegar or mayonaise, or both.
Make it three options -- that's logically what such sentence is trying to cram into two components.
-- Garzo.
and/or
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 1:49 am
by Kris
and/or is not a conjunction. the two words are joined only by a slash. it's easier for many to say and/or to avoid perhaps droning or specifics. it's the American way. it's faster!
Fast Food Language.
Re: and/or
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:31 am
by M. Henri Day
... it's the American way. it's faster!
It goes faster still in Swedish, where we write «
o/e» for «
och/eller». Superb Swedish engineering ?...
Henri
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:26 pm
by Kris
... it's the American way. it's faster!
It goes faster still in Swedish, where we write «o/e» for «och/eller». Superb Swedish engineering ?...
Henri
However, the Swedish text is an abbreviation, is this correct? If it means and/or then the Swedes are faster.
Kris
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:43 pm
by Brazilian dude
What about Spanish y/o, Italian e/o, and French et/ou? Those are not abbreviations.
Brazilian dude
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 8:09 pm
by Kris
What about Spanish y/o, Italian e/o, and French et/ou? Those are not abbreviations.
Brazilian dude
_________________
I added a thought to the original post. It had to do with the English language and there not being a conjunction for and/or.
I think maybe we strayed from the original post.
An American Mutt
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:54 am
by KatyBr
Kris, you may post on topic if you wish.
Kt
(and I like your idea~~ McEnglish!)
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:17 am
by Brazilian dude
I think maybe we strayed from the original post.
This isn't the first and won't be the last time this has happened.
Brazilian dude
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:37 am
by M. Henri Day
The meandering nature of our discussions is the secret of their not inconsiderable charm....
Henri
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 12:05 pm
by Brazilian dude
Well put, Mr. H.
Brazilian dude
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:56 pm
by Kris
The meandering nature of our discussions is the secret of their not inconsiderable charm....
Henri
Very nicely put Henri. I have a tendency to babble. It's nice to know that a board is available in which to do so.
Kris*
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:05 pm
by Brazilian dude
Kris*
Is there a typo in your signature? It's hard to imagine, but whenever I write Brazilian, I write Brazilain and have to go back and correct it. Good thing I never do that with my real name.
Lusiano Eduardo de Oliveira
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:17 pm
by KatyBr
Kris*, I'm glad you haven't come here trying to force us famous off-topic-ers to reform our errant ways.
Kt
we have had some try just that.
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:19 pm
by Brazilian dude
Kt
we have had some try just that.
And we are quite proficient at sending them packing.
Brazilian dude