Swedish subjunctive

A discussion of the peculiarities of languages and the differences between them.
Brazilian dude
Grand Panjandrum
Posts: 1464
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
Contact:

Postby Brazilian dude » Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:13 pm

Är is also am.

Brazilian dude
Languages rule!

User avatar
tcward
Senior Lexiterian
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: The Old North State

Postby tcward » Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:00 pm

I would probably say "be".

And I meant only to indicate to Miku how the translation lined up, so he would see where the parts of the sentence in Swedish corresponded to English, and I happened to use the subjunctive, since that's what we were talking about in the first place. I didn't mean to indicate that är translates into be, which I believe Henri pointed out would be vare in Swedish. My apologies for the confusion.

-Tim

M. Henri Day
Grand Panjandrum
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Stockholm, SVERIGE

Postby M. Henri Day » Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:20 am

anders wrote:...
To clarify, är is "is/are", and perfectly indicative.

Or, perhaps, presently indicative ?...

Henri
曾记否,到中流击水,浪遏飞舟?

User avatar
Apoclima
Senior Lexiterian
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:00 pm

Postby Apoclima » Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:32 am

Swedish doesn't really conjugate in the present tense, does it?

I thought you all decided democratically long-gago!

Apo!
'Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination.' -Max Planck

miku.
Junior Lexiterian
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 3:47 am
Location: Napoli

Postby miku. » Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:50 am

tcward wrote:I would probably say "be".

And I meant only to indicate to Miku how the translation lined up, so he would see where the parts of the sentence in Swedish corresponded to English


Thank you tcward, I was asking two explanations :)
Rimboccamaniche e scioglilinguagnolo

anders
Lexiterian
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:46 am
Location: Sweden

Postby anders » Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:09 am

Apoclima wrote:Swedish doesn't really conjugate in the present tense, does it?

I thought you all decided democratically long-gago!

Apo!


It's more a question of equality and egalitarianism among words than democracy.

All Swedish verbs make do with one form only for each tense, irrespectively of person, number, gender. The principal parts are, however, sometimes irregular. For simplicity, I find Swedish matched by Danish and Norwegian among IE languages, the three Scandinavians being only marginally more complex than Afrikaans.
Tromp: Afrikaans for all wrote:The Afrikaans verb is remarkably regular, and as it is no respecter of persons and numbers, and also shoots the rapids of mood, voice and tense without turning as much as a vowel, one can tell its conjugation at sight. At most the main verb takes on the prefix ge- in the past tense and the passive voice. Consider the typical verb om te bring, to bring:

Ek bring koffie (I bring coffee) becomes in the future tenses ek sal koffie bring (I shall bring coffee) and ek sal koffie gebring het (I shall have brought coffee). In the past tenses ek het koffie gebring does duty for the three English forms "I brought coffee", "I have brought coffee," and "I had brought coffee". This causes no confusion, as we have axiliaries, and "time words" [...] and the context withal, to stand by the constant verb.
Irren ist männlich

Iterman
Junior Lexiterian
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 6:04 am
Location: Sweden

Postby Iterman » Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:50 pm

Byråkraterna talar i imperativ, så ock agitatorerna.
Ingenjörerna talar i indikativ, så ock ombudsmännen.
De som ville att konjunktiven bestode, om möjligt vore, måtte ej vara många.

Alf Henriksson
Beg your pardon for my poor spelling and grammer.

M. Henri Day
Grand Panjandrum
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Stockholm, SVERIGE

Postby M. Henri Day » Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:00 am

Tack, Iterman (och Alf Henriksson) !

Henri
曾记否,到中流击水,浪遏飞舟?

anders
Lexiterian
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:46 am
Location: Sweden

Postby anders » Thu Apr 21, 2005 5:29 am

Among us subjunctive-huggers, it is not so much a question of quantity (många = "many") but quality, in the way so admirably displayed by, for example, Henri and Iterman.
Irren ist männlich


Return to “Languages of the World”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests