<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roomy, Rheumy and English Spelling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alphadictionary.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alphadictionary.com/blog/?p=603</link>
	<description>A Blog about Words and Language(s) from alphaDictionary.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobinGoodfellow</title>
		<link>http://www.alphadictionary.com/blog/?p=603&#038;cpage=1#comment-471549</link>
		<dc:creator>RobinGoodfellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alphadictionary.com/blog/?p=603#comment-471549</guid>
		<description>&quot;Over the same period, the orthography of Russian (1918), French (2004), German (1996), and Portuguese (2009), among other languages, have been reformed. Why not English?&quot;

Change occurs because of the human action model: I am unhappy where I am; I visualize a better place; I see a realistic path from one place to the other.

Just because some, forgive me, technocrat tells me something new is better doesn&#039;t make it so. It is the same reason we never embraced the metric system--we&#039;re rebels!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Over the same period, the orthography of Russian (1918), French (2004), German (1996), and Portuguese (2009), among other languages, have been reformed. Why not English?&#8221;</p>
<p>Change occurs because of the human action model: I am unhappy where I am; I visualize a better place; I see a realistic path from one place to the other.</p>
<p>Just because some, forgive me, technocrat tells me something new is better doesn&#8217;t make it so. It is the same reason we never embraced the metric system&#8211;we&#8217;re rebels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Welsch</title>
		<link>http://www.alphadictionary.com/blog/?p=603&#038;cpage=1#comment-182444</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Welsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alphadictionary.com/blog/?p=603#comment-182444</guid>
		<description>I just discovered your blog and I love it!

I was thinking the other day about what would have to happen for English spelling to be standardized, and I don&#039;t see how you could do it without making almost everybody in the English speaking world mad. 

For one thing, there are such a wide variety of pronunciations in English, that we would have to select one as the &quot;correct&quot; pronunciation for phonetic spelling. Imagine we picked a non-rhotic dialect, and for all us Americans &quot;car&quot; became &quot;ca,&quot; &quot;far&quot; became &quot;fa&quot; etc. 

Not to mention if we expanded the alphabet along the lines of the IPA, it could end up having around 48 letters!

Not to say that it can&#039;t be done. It would just be difficult.

Keep up the good work on your blog.

Daniel Welsch.
Linguist and ESL teacher in Madrid, Spain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered your blog and I love it!</p>
<p>I was thinking the other day about what would have to happen for English spelling to be standardized, and I don&#8217;t see how you could do it without making almost everybody in the English speaking world mad. </p>
<p>For one thing, there are such a wide variety of pronunciations in English, that we would have to select one as the &#8220;correct&#8221; pronunciation for phonetic spelling. Imagine we picked a non-rhotic dialect, and for all us Americans &#8220;car&#8221; became &#8220;ca,&#8221; &#8220;far&#8221; became &#8220;fa&#8221; etc. </p>
<p>Not to mention if we expanded the alphabet along the lines of the IPA, it could end up having around 48 letters!</p>
<p>Not to say that it can&#8217;t be done. It would just be difficult.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work on your blog.</p>
<p>Daniel Welsch.<br />
Linguist and ESL teacher in Madrid, Spain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
