• statesman •
Pronunciation: steyts-mên • Hear it!
Part of Speech: Noun
Meaning: 1. A well-spoken leader in national and international affairs. 2. An intelligent, articulate, leader in any field, as an elder statesman of biology.
Notes: Today's Good Word is a derivation from state "the political organization of a sovereign nation" + the suffix -man [mên]—and not the noun man [mæn]. Although the suffix historically developed from the word, man, it has since become a suffix. Like suffixes, it is never accented and its plural is pronounced identical with the singular [mên]. Postman [’post-mên] is thus gender neutral while mailman [meyl-mæn], oddly enough, is not. Mailman allows mailwoman because it is a compound of mail + (the word) man. Dr. Goodword thus agrees with the Oxford English Dictionary, Random House, and Merriam-Webster that this word applies to both sexes and disagrees with those that claim that it is a compound based on the word "man" that refers only to men.
In Play: "Margaret Thatcher is a British statesman" is therefore proper and politically correct English so long as "man" is pronounced as unaccented [mên]. We like to use the term to distinguish between genuine leaders in public affairs and those skilled mostly in the electoral process. "Lester is a clever politician but not much of statesman" would mean that Lester is better at getting himself elected to office than running the office he is elected to.
Word History: The stem of today's Good Word comes to us from Latin status "posture, attitude, condition, standing (in society)" via Old French estat. We moved the [e] to the end but kept the original, too, adding an [e] to the end of it, resulting in a second word, estate (again, English making the most of its lexical booty). The Latin word is a past participle of stare "to stand", which developed from the same PIE root as English stand, as well as the word for stand in virtually all Indo-European languages: Russian stat', German stehen, Spanish estar, Swedish står, to mention but a few.
STATESMAN
- Dr. Goodword
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7452
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:28 am
- Location: Lewisburg, PA
- Contact:
STATESMAN
• The Good Dr. Goodword
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
- Dr. Goodword
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7452
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:28 am
- Location: Lewisburg, PA
- Contact:
A better explanation
How can you get a better explanation than the truth? The evidence supports this explanation which means it is probably true.
• The Good Dr. Goodword
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
-
- Junior Lexiterian
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 7:13 am
- Location: UK
Anders,
What's your position on the "man" as genderless suffix question? I am interested particularly as your tag "Irren ist männlich" is quite specific as to gender. I have occasionally wondered if was a deliberate choice. The version "Irren ist menschlich" is gender-free and is, I think, more commonly found.
Derek
Irren ist menschlich. Aber wer richtigen Mist bauen will, braucht einen Computer.
What's your position on the "man" as genderless suffix question? I am interested particularly as your tag "Irren ist männlich" is quite specific as to gender. I have occasionally wondered if was a deliberate choice. The version "Irren ist menschlich" is gender-free and is, I think, more commonly found.
Derek
Irren ist menschlich. Aber wer richtigen Mist bauen will, braucht einen Computer.
My tag is of course a play on words, with the added intent to make fun of any male supremacists.
On genderless "man", that's no problem for me in Swedish. IMHO, the issue should be even less of a problem in English, because of for example the very established "man" in "mankind".
Some of our legal texts start by stating something like "In this text, 'he' may refer to either gender".
I like the B.C. cartoon, in which an umpire warns somebody for "unsportspersonlike behaviour". That's such a good illustration of how silly unnecessary oversensitivity can be.
On genderless "man", that's no problem for me in Swedish. IMHO, the issue should be even less of a problem in English, because of for example the very established "man" in "mankind".
Some of our legal texts start by stating something like "In this text, 'he' may refer to either gender".
I like the B.C. cartoon, in which an umpire warns somebody for "unsportspersonlike behaviour". That's such a good illustration of how silly unnecessary oversensitivity can be.
Irren ist männlich
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:24 am
- Location: Stockholm, SVERIGE
Alas, this sort of thing even occurs in Swedish. The other day I heard a reporter on Swedish Radio refer to the (female) spokesman of a certain political party as «talesperson». «Taleskvinna» I can accept, but «talesperson» is a bridge too far !......
On genderless "man", that's no problem for me in Swedish...
I like the B.C. cartoon, in which an umpire warns somebody for "unsportspersonlike behaviour". That's such a good illustration of how silly unnecessary oversensitivity can be.
Henri
曾记否,到中流击水,浪遏飞舟?
Return to “Good Word Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests