But this last sentence is not a scientific but a moral statement, containing as it does a «should». The question here is whether moral questions related to H sap sap's relations to animal species are to be dealt with at the international, at the national, at the regional, or at the local level. I don't think there exists a single level appropriate to our relations with all species, but as regards so unbounded species as the great whales, I find the global the only possible level.......
But I sense morality creeping into the whole argument here. This troubles me. If (and only if) an animal species scientifically is proven to have robust likelyhood of survival, then it should be up to individual cultures how to utilise them. ...
鯨萬歲 !
Henri