I just realized that both Latin docere (teach) and German lehren (teach) take a double accusative: aliquem aliquid docere, jemanden etwas lehren (teach someone something). Isn't this amazing?
Brazilian dude
Double accusative
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
Double accusative
Languages rule!
Well, I am not fit for dabbling in the literature of theoretical linguistics but, if my fleeting memory serves anything, linguists regard the object to teach (or maybe the person to teach as well) as a overt (or morphological) accusative with a covert (or functional) case other than accusative.
A phenomenon to justify such a treatment in Latin would be subordinate clauses whose verb is infinitive. In "audio Cleopatram Antonium amavisse (I hear Cleopatra loved Antonius or I hear Antonius loved Cleopatra)," both of the nouns are in accusative, whereas the argument structure of the verb "amo" claims an Agent and a Patient. In a simplex Latin sentence whose verb is "amo," Agent nouns assume nominative, and Patient nouns accusative. In my compound clause above, the nouns are interpreted as serving as Agent and Patient, thus functionally in nominative and accusative, though which noun assumes which role is not all together clear grammatically.
As for your German example, BD, I am wondering if replacing "etwas" with a noun with the definite article in accusative is possible.
A phenomenon to justify such a treatment in Latin would be subordinate clauses whose verb is infinitive. In "audio Cleopatram Antonium amavisse (I hear Cleopatra loved Antonius or I hear Antonius loved Cleopatra)," both of the nouns are in accusative, whereas the argument structure of the verb "amo" claims an Agent and a Patient. In a simplex Latin sentence whose verb is "amo," Agent nouns assume nominative, and Patient nouns accusative. In my compound clause above, the nouns are interpreted as serving as Agent and Patient, thus functionally in nominative and accusative, though which noun assumes which role is not all together clear grammatically.
As for your German example, BD, I am wondering if replacing "etwas" with a noun with the definite article in accusative is possible.
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
Your comment about the accusative subject is perfect, it never occurred to me that there could be an analogy between that and the verb docere.
Brazilian dude
Sure. Er lehrt sie die Aussprache der deutschen Städte. He teaches her the pronunciation of the German towns. Which could also be rendered with the verb beibringen, but then you'd have your regular dative plus accusative: Er bringt ihr die Aussprache der deutschen Städte bei.As for your German example, BD, I am wondering if replacing "etwas" with a noun with the definite article in accusative is possible.
Brazilian dude
Languages rule!
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
This accusative talk reminds me that it is possible in German, as well as in many other languages, among them English (only Germanic and Romance?), to have a subject in the accusative form after causative and sense verbs:
Er sah mich weggehen - He saw me leave. - Hij zag me weggaan. - Han såg mig avgå. - Ele me viu sair*. - Él me vio salir. - Ell va veure'm sortir. - Egli mi vide uscire. - Il m'a vu sortir. - Ille vidit me exire.
I think it's the same case.
Brazilian dude
P.S. It's interesting to note that many Brazilians (erroneously) use a nominative subject in this case: Ele viu eu sair.
Er sah mich weggehen - He saw me leave. - Hij zag me weggaan. - Han såg mig avgå. - Ele me viu sair*. - Él me vio salir. - Ell va veure'm sortir. - Egli mi vide uscire. - Il m'a vu sortir. - Ille vidit me exire.
I think it's the same case.
Brazilian dude
P.S. It's interesting to note that many Brazilians (erroneously) use a nominative subject in this case: Ele viu eu sair.
Languages rule!
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
Uggr, I was expecting No for your answer just to make things clean and tight, locked and stored. But as languages rule, there is no arguing by mere humans.Sure. Er lehrt sie die Aussprache der deutschen Städte.
Perhaps scrambling the word order changes the countenance of the problem here. Here are English example.
1a. I like him very much.
1b. Him I like very much.
2a. Give me some water.
2b. *Me give some water.
2c. To me give some water.
1b is slightly awkward but still grammatical, whereas 2b is a very bad sentence. The only way to salvage the extraposed "me" is to create a prepositional clause by adding "to." Since "me" in sentences 2a-c behaves differently from that of 1a and b, which is a normal accusative, it is safe to say that BD's double-negative is not two accusatives completely the same in syntactic functionality governed by the same verb.
By the way, what does bei in "Er bringt ihr die Aussprache der deutschen Städte bei" govern, assuming it is a preposition?
Flam
-
- Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Botucatu - SP Brazil
Well, bei can indeed be a preposition, but there it functions just like a particle to form phrasal verbs: bringen (to bring), abbringen (to dissuade), anbringen (to fasten; to display; to use), beibringen (to teach), herausbringen (to bring up), wegbringen (to take out). What is going on in German is that these particles have to be detached from the verb in main clauses with a verb in the present, imperative or preterite.
Brazilian dude
Brazilian dude
Languages rule!
That's Object-to-Subject raising, quite a universal phenomenon found in languages like Japanese.This accusative talk reminds me that it is possible in German, as well as in many other languages, among them English (only Germanic and Romance?), to have a subject in the accusative form after causative and sense verbs:
E.g.,わたしは彼(を/は)馬鹿だと思った。
Gross: I thought him to be an idiot.
When accusative particle o- is used, kare (he) is raised from the subject position for being stupid to the object position for thinking.
Return to “Languages of the World”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests