• rankle •
Pronunciation: ræng-kêl • Hear it!
Part of Speech: Verb
Meaning: 1. To deeply and persistently irritate. 2. To remain inflamed and worsen, to fester.
Notes: A word similar to today's, wrangle "to argue persistently", begins with an irrelevant W. In fact, confusion can arise with a number of English words with irrelevant Ws, like write, wriggle, and wring. Remember that rankle is not among them. Also remember that the E comes off before suffixes that begin with a vowel, as in rankling.
In Play: Rankle is a verb that may perform intransitive or transitive duty. You may rankle over an affront: "It still rankles in Abel Mann's heart that Myrna left him so abruptly without even taking off his Harley-Davidson leather jacket." It is also possible for an affront or a person to rankle you: "The new Mercedes in his neighbor's driveway rankles Foster more than he is willing to admit."
Word History: Today's Good Word has a twisted history that snakes its way from snakes through festering sores to the festering resentment is indicates today. It all began with Latin draco(n) "serpent", which English also grabbed directly for its word dragon. However, the word had a diminutive, dracunculus, meaning "little snake", which was inherited by Old French, where it was melted down to draoncle and came to mean "festering sore". This noun was converted into a verb, draoncler "to fester". The noun and the verb somehow lost the initial D before Old English borrowed the verb as ranclen "to fester", whence today's Good Word.
RANKLE
- Dr. Goodword
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7465
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:28 am
- Location: Lewisburg, PA
- Contact:
RANKLE
• The Good Dr. Goodword
- Slava
- Great Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 8141
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:31 am
- Location: Finger Lakes, NY
Irrelevant Ws?
A nice word, I just used it in a post and decided to search for it here. Voilá, here it is. Now, however, I have to question just what an "irrelevant W" is.
In most of the words cited above, the W actually does produce a new word. It may not change the pronunciation, but it does provide the clue to the meaning. Write and rite, wring and ring, wrangle and rangle, (okay, that one's obsolete); these are all different words. I'm sure there are many others, and Mr. W would not appreciate being called irrelevant, I dare say.
As I'm a Harry Potter fan, I can't resist adding that calling young Malfoy Dracunculus would have been a great insult.
In most of the words cited above, the W actually does produce a new word. It may not change the pronunciation, but it does provide the clue to the meaning. Write and rite, wring and ring, wrangle and rangle, (okay, that one's obsolete); these are all different words. I'm sure there are many others, and Mr. W would not appreciate being called irrelevant, I dare say.
As I'm a Harry Potter fan, I can't resist adding that calling young Malfoy Dracunculus would have been a great insult.
- Dr. Goodword
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7465
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:28 am
- Location: Lewisburg, PA
- Contact:
Superfluous W
When I speak about letters, I assume the primary function of letters, to symbolize sounds. While superfluous letters do randomly and occasionally distinguish two homophones like ring and wring, they are mostly useless, e.g. all the GHs still clinging on pointlessly in words like though, through, etc. Even in the case of ring and wring, the superfluous W conceals the fact that the two words are, in fact, homophones.
• The Good Dr. Goodword
-
- Great Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:41 pm
- Location: RUSTON, LA
- Contact:
Return to “Good Word Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 6 guests