Heard multiple times recently on NPR (!):
‘ . . . a group of bipartisan legislators . . . .’
I mean, I admit to a certain fussiness, but it’s not exactly the difference between ‘on/in behalf of’.
Bass-ackwards or Group Schizophrenia?
- Slava
- Great Grand Panjandrum
- Posts: 8158
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:31 am
- Location: Finger Lakes, NY
Re: Bass-ackwards or Group Schizophrenia?
I get the fussiness, but this makes sense as it stands. The legislators are behaving in a bipartisan manner, open to working with the other side; therefore, the legislators are bipartisan. No?
Life is like playing chess with chessmen who each have thoughts and feelings and motives of their own.
Re: Bass-ackwards or Group Schizophrenia?
Thanks. I understand how you read it that way, but the OED offers this sole definition:
Of, representing, or composed of members of, two (political or other) parties.
Of, representing, or composed of members of, two (political or other) parties.
- Dr. Goodword
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7469
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:28 am
- Location: Lewisburg, PA
- Contact:
Re: Bass-ackwards or Group Schizophrenia?
I don't think Brogine is fussy at all. The word bipartisan is misplaced. It requires the listener to figure out that while individuals can't be bipartisan, the speaker must have meant "bipartisan group".
I would have to disagree with our new editor of the GW series, Slava, on this one. "Individuals with bipartisan attitudes is a stretch. I don't think that is what the speaker had in mind.
I would have to disagree with our new editor of the GW series, Slava, on this one. "Individuals with bipartisan attitudes is a stretch. I don't think that is what the speaker had in mind.
• The Good Dr. Goodword
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests