Unfortuately, I don't know enough Latin to actually pronounce it!Ecce potestas casei
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com ... latin.html
Unfortuately, I don't know enough Latin to actually pronounce it!Ecce potestas casei
I see that. That's a shame because it was humorous.the site is no longer there.
Actually, it's just from scw1217's signature, where she says she's into photography. No real picture involved here.I'm not sure what the photo in question is; I suppose it was on the page with the dead link.
This is what I'm fighting against. The attempt to equate digital diddling with art. In no way shape or form does the digital realm approach physical art....he said it was no different than any other artist; his medium just happend to be in the digital realm, and he manipulated the bits in a picture instead of paint on a canvas.
... In no way shape or form does the digital realm approach physical art.
Yes, this is what I was driving at in my rant. While some great things can be done on computer, the fact that it can be replicated by anyone with a wee bit of talent and some patience detracts heavily from the art value for me. And reworking photographs is really drudge work, as far as I'm concerned. Taking the photo, knowing what you did and why you did it, is the art part. Anything on a computer is digital diddling.One of the best definitions of art I ever heard was that if it can be replicated by most people, it isn't art.
I know HOW to play a guitar; that doesn't mean I play it WELL.I know, skinem, and to be honest, artists do curl their lips in disdain at those who confuse possession of a tool with proficiency with a tool. (It's my understanding that plumbers and building contractors have similar worldviews -- ha!--) ...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests